• Solid results as expected in 3Q16; reiterate Buy EK Holding net profit came in at USD12.1mn in 3Q16, broadly in line with our USD12.88mn estimate. It is now well on its path of achieving our full-year estimate of USD63mn in 2016, which means the stock is trading at an undemanding 2016e PE multiple of only c8x vs. our implied multiple of 13x. EK offers a number of attractive features such as: i) cash-rich balance sheet; ii) expansion plans at Natenergy and Sprea that should drive c14% growth in EK earnings through to 2020; and iii) lucrative USD dividend yield of c6.3%. We are also positive on a recovery in the stock’s liquidity from an increase in USD flows on EGX; hence, we reiterate our Buy rating on the stock, especially with it gaining momentum lately. • Natenergy & Sprea at the forefront; Alexfert breaks even Natenergy and Sprea continued to represent the bulk of earnings and post quarterly growths of 3% and 7%, respectively. Both entities have enjoyed healthy operating environments in their respective fields, given that: i) Natenergy’s utility prices and grid connectivity have been rising; and ii) Sprea enjoys a leading market share (c80%) across its products. At Alexfert, while the company only managed to breakeven, we had expected an even weaker quarter on: i) urea being priced at USD190/tonne (-8% Q-o-Q, -36% Y-o-Y); ii) gas shortage in the summer; and iii) a two-week maintenance shutdown, which typically drives other costs higher. We think cost efficiency was the backbone of the better-than-expected results. • Arbitration case settled; finally a light at the end of the tunnel After years of disputes, EK finally settled its case with Egypt government on Alexfert’s gas pricing, a decision the market was not relying on its occurrence, given the lengthy settlement process. The final outcome of the settlement should bode well, as: i) it provides visibility on earnings, with full gas allocation now being promised, at the risk of EGAS incurring a USD2/mmbtu penalty for short volumes; as well as ii) setting in stone a fixed gas price of USD4.5/mmbtu (vs. our estimate for a gas price formula that implies cUSD5.5/mmbtu on a terminal basis); hence, while the decision offers only a c1% upside to our 2017 EPS estimate, we see a longer term upside risk materialising.
Ahmed Hazem Maher
This website uses cookies to make the site work, to understand if the site is working well, how it is being used, to connect to social media sites (such as Facebook and Twitter) and to collect information useful to allow us and our partners to provide you with more relevant ads . Some cookies are essential to make the site work, but you can control how we use non-essential cookies at any time by clicking the “ON/OFF” button next to each category. For more information about the cookies used on this site, see Privacy Policy.
Decide which cookies you want to allow.
Strictly Necessary
These cookies are essential in order to enable you to move around our website and use its features, such as accessing secure areas of our website. Without these cookies, any services on our Site you wish to access cannot be provided.
Analytical/performance cookies
Visitors use our website, for instance which pages you go to most often, and if you get error messages from web pages.